The Hidden Costs of Running AI Agents on Bare Metal
Running AI agents on bare metal costs more than you think. Security incidents, idle compute - learn the real costs and smarter alternatives.
The Hidden Costs of Running AI Agents on Bare Metal
Running AI agents on a plain server sounds simple. Spin up an EC2 instance, SSH in, run your agent, done. The monthly cost shows up on your AWS bill and you know exactly what you're paying.
Except you don't. The EC2 bill is maybe 30% of the real cost. The rest is hidden in engineering time, security risks, and infrastructure you're paying for but not using.
This article breaks down the hidden costs of running AI agents on bare metal - and why per-agent isolated environments are cheaper in the long run.
Hidden Cost #1: Security Engineering
When an AI agent runs on a server, it shares that server with everything else. The agent's process can access:
- Other processes running on the same machine
- The host filesystem (including other users' data)
- The network (including internal services)
- Environment variables and secrets
- The Docker daemon (if you're using Docker)
What this means in practice
If you're building a SaaS product where users interact with AI agents, one user's agent can potentially access another user's data. You need to prevent this with:
- Container isolation - set up Docker or containerd (1-2 weeks)
- Network policies - configure iptables/nftables rules (1 week)
- Secrets management - Vault or AWS Secrets Manager (1 week)
- Filesystem sandboxing - AppArmor/SELinux profiles (1-2 weeks)
- Monitoring for escapes - Falco or similar runtime security (1 week)
- Regular CVE patching - ongoing engineer time
Real cost: 4-8 weeks of senior engineer time upfront, plus ongoing maintenance. At $150K salary, that's $12-25K just for initial setup, plus $2-5K/month ongoing.
And even with all this, container escapes happen. New CVEs are discovered in container runtimes multiple times per year.
Hidden Cost #2: Idle Compute
AI agent workloads are intensely bursty. Users are active during business hours, agents run for minutes to hours, then go idle. But your servers run 24/7.
The math
Say you need capacity for 100 concurrent agents during peak hours (9 AM - 6 PM):
| Time | Active Agents | Servers Needed | Servers Running | Utilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 AM - 12 PM | 80 | 10 | 10 | 80% |
| 12 PM - 2 PM | 100 | 12 | 12 | 83% |
| 2 PM - 6 PM | 70 | 9 | 12 | 58% |
| 6 PM - 9 AM | 5 | 1 | 12 | 4% |
You're running 12 servers 24/7 (288 server-hours/day) but only using them productively for ~140 server-hours. You're paying for 2x the compute you actually use.
With auto-scaling groups, you can reduce this - but ASGs take 1-3 minutes to scale, and you still need headroom for sudden spikes.
Real cost: 40-60% of your compute bill is paying for idle servers.
Hidden Cost #3: Operational Overhead
Running servers means operating servers. For each server:
- OS updates - security patches, kernel upgrades, reboots
- Disk management - monitoring usage, cleaning old data, expanding volumes
- Log management - collecting, storing, rotating, searching
- Process supervision - restart crashed agents, handle zombie processes
- Health checks - detect and replace unhealthy instances
- Backup and recovery - snapshot volumes, test restore procedures
For a fleet of 12 servers, you need:
- At least a part-time SRE/DevOps engineer
- PagerDuty or similar on-call rotation
- Runbooks for common failures
- Disaster recovery procedures
Real cost: $5-15K/month in engineer time, tooling, and on-call burden.
Hidden Cost #4: Multi-Tenancy Bugs
When multiple users share a server (even with containers), you eventually hit multi-tenancy bugs:
- User A's agent fills the disk → User B's agent can't write files
- User A's agent uses all the CPU → User B's agent becomes slow
- User A's agent creates 10,000 processes → host runs out of PIDs
- User A's agent opens a port → User B's agent can't bind to it
Each bug requires investigation, a fix, and probably an incident post-mortem. These bugs are especially hard to reproduce because they depend on timing and load patterns.
Real cost: 1-3 days of senior engineer time per incident, 2-5 incidents per quarter.
Hidden Cost #5: Compliance and Auditing
If you handle user data (and AI agents always do), you need to demonstrate data isolation and security. With bare-metal multi-tenancy:
- SOC 2 - prove that user data is isolated (hard with shared filesystems)
- GDPR right to deletion - prove that a user's data is completely removed (hard when an agent might have written files anywhere)
- HIPAA - if processing health data, prove hardware-level isolation (impossible with containers)
- Penetration testing - demonstrate that container escapes are mitigated
Real cost: $20-50K/year for compliance auditing, plus engineer time for remediation.
With hardware-isolated VMs, most of these become trivially provable: each user has their own VM, encryption key, and filesystem. Delete the key → data is gone.
Hidden Cost #6: Scaling Engineering
Going from 10 to 100 to 1000 concurrent agents on bare metal requires:
- Load balancer configuration - route users to the right server
- Service discovery - know which server has capacity
- State management - track which agent is running where
- Graceful draining - move agents before taking a server down
- Capacity planning - predict future needs, buy reserved instances
This is a full-time infrastructure engineering role. Companies typically hire 1-2 SRE/platform engineers specifically for this.
Real cost: $150-300K/year in engineering salary for scaling infrastructure.
The Alternative: Per-Agent Workspaces
What if each agent ran in its own workspace?
| Hidden Cost | Bare Metal | Per-Agent Workspaces |
|---|---|---|
| Security engineering | 4-8 weeks setup + ongoing | Default (hardware isolated) |
| Idle compute | 40-60% waste | $0 when idle |
| Operational overhead | $5-15K/month | Managed by provider |
| Multi-tenancy bugs | 2-5 incidents/quarter | Impossible (single tenant) |
| Compliance auditing | $20-50K/year | Hardware isolation = easy proof |
| Scaling engineering | $150-300K/year | API call to create workspace |
Per-agent workspaces have a higher per-compute-minute cost than bare metal. But when you factor in all the hidden costs, they're often cheaper at any scale.
When Bare Metal Makes Sense
To be fair, bare metal is the right choice when:
- You have a dedicated SRE team - the operational overhead is their full-time job anyway
- Agents are long-running (days/weeks) - idle compute waste is minimal because agents rarely sleep
- You don't need multi-tenancy - running your own agents, not users' agents
- Scale is very predictable - 50 agents all day, every day, with minimal variance
- Budget is extremely tight - per-minute pricing adds up at very high utilization
But for most startups and growth-stage companies building AI products with user-facing agents, per-agent workspaces save more than they cost.
Calculating Your Real Cost
Add up:
- Monthly compute bill (EC2, GCP, etc.)
- Engineer hours spent on infrastructure × hourly rate
- Cost of security tooling (container scanning, runtime monitoring)
- Cost of incidents (downtime × revenue impact + engineer debugging time)
- Cost of compliance (auditing, pen testing, remediation)
- Lost productivity from scaling work vs. product work
Compare that to:
- Per-minute workspace cost × estimated usage
- That's it.
For most teams, option 2 is cheaper - and frees up engineering time to build the actual product.
Summary
The server bill is the smallest cost of running AI agents on bare metal. The real costs are:
- Security - weeks of setup, ongoing CVE management
- Idle compute - paying for servers when agents aren't running
- Operations - monitoring, patching, restarts, on-call
- Multi-tenancy - bugs that only happen at scale
- Compliance - proving isolation with shared infrastructure
- Scaling - engineering work that doesn't build your product
Per-agent isolated workspaces eliminate all of these. Higher per-minute price, lower total cost of ownership.
Learn more → Oblien vs Traditional Cloud | Documentation
The Future of Software: AI Agents That Build, Deploy, and Maintain Applications
Where AI agent infrastructure is heading - from today's code assistants to autonomous systems that build, ship, and operate software.
How to Boot a Full Linux VM in Under 200 Milliseconds
Most VMs take 30–60s to boot. Firecracker does it in under 200ms. Learn the engineering behind sub-second boot for AI agents and sandboxes.