Oblien
Architecture

How to Auto-Scale AI Agent Workers from Zero to Thousands

Build an auto-scaling system for AI agents that scales to thousands of workers and drops to zero when idle. No Kubernetes required.

Oblien Team profile picture
Oblien Team
1 min read

How to Auto-Scale AI Agent Workers from Zero to Thousands

AI agent workloads are bursty. At 3 AM, you might have 2 agents running. At 2 PM when your users are active, you might need 500. By midnight, it's back to 10.

Traditional auto-scaling (Kubernetes HPA, AWS Auto Scaling Groups) assumes workloads change gradually. But agent workloads spike instantly - a viral tweet about your product sends 200 users in 5 minutes, each launching an agent.

This guide shows how to build auto-scaling for AI agents that handles spikes in seconds, not minutes.


Why Agent Scaling Is Different

Web servers: predictable

A web server handles 100 requests/second. When traffic doubles, you add another server. Requests are stateless, fast, and uniform. Auto-scaling is straightforward.

AI agents: unpredictable

An AI agent might run for 30 seconds or 3 hours. It writes files, spawns processes, and uses varying amounts of CPU and memory. Each agent is stateful - you can't just kill it and retry on another node. Agent workloads are:

  • Long-running - minutes to hours, not milliseconds
  • Stateful - each agent has its own workspace and files
  • Heterogeneous - different agents use different amounts of resources
  • Bursty - usage spikes 10-100x during peak times
  • User-triggered - each user interaction can spawn a new agent

The Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────┐
│  Your Application            │
│  (handles user requests)     │
└──────────┬──────────────────┘
           │ "User wants to run an agent"

┌─────────────────────────────┐
│  Queue / Dispatcher          │
│  (Redis, SQS, or in-app)    │
│                              │
│  Decides:                    │
│  - What type of agent        │
│  - Resource requirements     │
│  - Priority / scheduling     │
└──────────┬──────────────────┘
           │ Creates workspace on demand

┌─────────────────────────────┐
│  Oblien Workspaces           │
│                              │
│  ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐   │
│  │Agent│ │Agent│ │Agent│   │
│  │  1  │ │  2  │ │  3  │   │
│  └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘   │
│  ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐           │
│  │Agent│ │Agent│  ...       │
│  │  4  │ │  5  │           │
│  └─────┘ └─────┘           │
└─────────────────────────────┘

No cluster to manage. No node groups to configure. Create a workspace when you need an agent, destroy it when done.


Scale-Up: Zero to Hundreds in Seconds

When your app needs to run an agent, create a workspace. Each workspace boots in milliseconds. There's no warm-up pool to manage, no nodes to provision, no capacity planning.

The workflow:

  1. User triggers an agent (e.g., "analyze this codebase")
  2. Your dispatcher calls the Oblien SDK to create a workspace
  3. Milliseconds later, the workspace is running
  4. Your dispatcher starts the agent inside the workspace
  5. Agent does its work (minutes to hours)
  6. Agent finishes → workspace auto-deletes

If 200 users trigger agents simultaneously, you create 200 workspaces. Each one is independent, so there's no contention or queueing.


Scale-Down: Back to Zero

This is where traditional infrastructure fails. With Kubernetes:

  • Nodes take 1-3 minutes to provision
  • Cluster autoscaler is conservative (waits before scaling down)
  • Idle nodes cost money ($100+/month per node)
  • You end up paying for "just in case" capacity

With per-agent workspaces:

  • Each workspace exists only while the agent runs
  • When the agent finishes, the workspace is deleted immediately
  • No idle capacity - you only pay for active agents
  • Zero agents running = zero compute cost

The Dispatcher Pattern

Your dispatcher is the brain of the auto-scaling system. It decides:

When to create workspaces

  • Immediately on user request (most common)
  • Pre-warm a small pool for <50ms response time
  • Queue and batch during extreme spikes

What resources to allocate

Different agent types need different resources:

Agent TypeCPURAMDiskEstimated Duration
Code analysis22 GB5 GB2-10 min
Code generation44 GB10 GB3-15 min
Data processing28 GB20 GB5-30 min
Long-running assistant11 GB5 GBHours

When to terminate

  • Agent completes its task → immediate cleanup
  • Timeout exceeded → force terminate and notify the user
  • User cancels → graceful shutdown
  • Workspace idle for too long → auto-pause or delete

Handling the Cold Start Trade-off

Millisecond boot time is fast, but if you need to install packages after boot, the real ready-time could be 10-30 seconds. Three strategies:

Strategy 1: Pre-built images

Create custom images with everything pre-installed. An image with Python + LangChain + ChromaDB + all your agent's dependencies boots just as fast as a base image - the packages are already on disk.

Strategy 2: Snapshot resume

When an agent finishes, instead of deleting the workspace, pause it. The next request for the same type of agent resumes the paused workspace almost instantly - all packages are already installed, all caches are warm.

Keep a pool of paused workspaces per agent type:

  • 5 paused code-generation workspaces ready to resume
  • 3 paused data-processing workspaces ready to resume
  • Cost: only disk storage, near-zero compute

Strategy 3: Pre-warm pool

Keep N workspaces running and idle, ready to accept tasks instantly. When one is claimed, add a new one to the pool.

Pool SizeReady TimeCost
0 (on-demand only)Milliseconds + setupZero when idle
3 (pre-warm)<10msSmall fixed cost
10 (aggressive)<5msModerate fixed cost

Most teams start with on-demand and add pre-warming only if their UX requires it.


Monitoring and Rate Limiting

Metrics to track

  • Active workspaces - how many agents are running right now?
  • Queue depth - how many requests are waiting?
  • Boot latency - p50, p95, p99 workspace creation time
  • Agent duration - how long do agents run on average?
  • Cost per agent - compute cost per agent invocation

Rate limiting

Prevent a single user from spawning 1000 agents:

  • Max concurrent agents per user (e.g., 5)
  • Max agents per hour per user (e.g., 50)
  • Total concurrent workspace limit per account
  • Burst limit with rate limiting

Fault Tolerance

What if a workspace crashes mid-task?

Agents are stateful - you can't simply retry from the beginning. Options:

  1. Checkpointing - periodically save agent state to external storage. If the workspace crashes, create a new one and restore the checkpoint.

  2. Idempotent tasks - design agents so rerunning them from scratch produces the same result. Works for analysis tasks, not for partial code generation.

  3. Workspace health checks - ping the workspace every 10 seconds. If it doesn't respond, mark the task as failed and notify the user.

  4. Automatic retry with backoff - for transient failures, create a new workspace and retry. Limit to 3 attempts.

What if the Oblien control plane is unavailable?

Queue tasks locally. When the API is back, drain the queue and create workspaces. Your dispatcher should handle this gracefully:

  • Store pending tasks in Redis or your database
  • Retry workspace creation with exponential backoff
  • Give users a status: "Your agent is queued, not started"

Cost Optimization

Per-second billing

Oblien charges per-second. An agent that runs for 47 seconds costs 47 seconds of compute, not 1 minute.

Right-sizing

Start agents with minimal resources and scale up if needed. Many agents only need 1 CPU and 512 MB RAM. Over-provisioning doubles your cost for no benefit.

Idle timeout

Set aggressive idle timeouts for non-user-facing agents. If an agent hasn't produced output in 5 minutes, it's probably stuck - terminate and notify.

Pausing between tasks

If a user will likely run another agent soon (e.g., iterating on generated code), pause the workspace instead of deleting it. Resume is faster and avoids package reinstallation.


Comparison with Alternatives

ApproachScale TimeCost at ZeroMax ScaleOps Complexity
Single serverN/A$50+/month~10 agentsLow
Kubernetes + HPA1-3 minNode costs~1000Very high
AWS Lambda100-500ms$0ThousandsMedium
Oblien workspacesMilliseconds$0ThousandsLow

Lambda is close but can't do persistent state, long-running tasks, or arbitrary system packages.


Summary

Auto-scaling AI agents:

  1. Create a workspace per agent - millisecond boot, no cluster to manage
  2. Delete when done - zero cost when no agents are running
  3. Pre-warm optional - keep a small pool for instant response if needed
  4. Right-size resources - different agent types get different allocations
  5. Rate limit - prevent abuse with per-user concurrent limits
  6. Monitor - track active agents, costs, and failure rates

The best scaling system has no idle infrastructure. With per-agent workspaces, you pay only for agents that are actually working.

Related readingArchitecture Patterns for AI Agents | Oblien Documentation